Google’s John Mueller defined what he would take into account being a search high quality challenge, inflicting rating points particular to Google contemplating the positioning not “high quality.” John mentioned on Twitter “to me, high quality points are issues that customers would take into account to be problematic.”
He added that technical points that customers don’t see doubtless wouldn’t be thought-about a top quality challenge by Google. John mentioned, “dangerous rel-canonical resulting in an alternate URL being listed one thing customers would discover? In all probability not.”
John additionally mentioned it is not uncommon to see each high quality and technical points on the identical website however that doesn’t imply the 2 are the identical. John wrote, “each technical points & high quality points are extraordinarily extensive fields, there’s all the time some overlap (eg, is velocity a top quality or a technical challenge?).” “If a website has obvious points in one of many two, then tweaking the opposite facet will not make a giant impression,” he added.
Listed below are the tweets associated to this, so you’ll be able to see it in context:
.@johnmu are search engine optimization technical points high quality points? I’ve seen articles that say you mentioned they have been and that you just mentioned they weren’t lol
Simply attempting to get clarification.
— Kristine Schachinger (@schachin) September 21, 2022
Each technical points & high quality points are extraordinarily extensive fields, there’s all the time some overlap (eg, is velocity a top quality or a technical challenge?). If a website has obvious points in one of many two, then tweaking the opposite facet will not make a giant impression.
— 🌽〈hyperlink href=//johnmu.com rel=canonical 〉🌽 (@JohnMu) September 21, 2022
It is dependent upon what you take into account a top quality challenge. To me, high quality points are issues that customers would take into account to be problematic. Is a nasty rel-canonical resulting in an alternate URL being listed one thing customers would discover? In all probability not.
— 🌽〈hyperlink href=//johnmu.com rel=canonical 〉🌽 (@JohnMu) September 21, 2022
And considerably associated however in a unique thread, John wrote “Simply because a web site is technically legitimate does not imply it is a helpful & related search outcome for customers.”
Simply because a web site is technically legitimate does not imply it is a helpful & related search outcome for customers.
— 🌽〈hyperlink href=//johnmu.com rel=canonical 〉🌽 (@JohnMu) September 21, 2022
So technical points and high quality points are totally different, in keeping with John Mueller of Google.
Discussion board dialogue at Twitter.
