Story at-a-glance
- The World Well being Group introduced that it’s working with Massive Tech to fight misinformation on-line
- On account of WHO’s “coverage updates,” 850,000 YouTube movies associated to “dangerous or deceptive COVID-19 misinformation” have been faraway from the platform from February 2020 to January 2021
- Lest you see all sides of a difficulty and kind an informed opinion of your personal, WHO intends to fastidiously management the web so that you solely see what it deems because the “reality”
- To perform this, WHO is working carefully with grasp manipulators in their very own proper, together with YouTube, Google, Fb and NewsGuard
- WHO has devoted a webpage to reporting misinformation on-line, with direct hyperlinks to social media platforms, making it simple to snitch on those that go in opposition to the established order
- Important parts of regulatory businesses’ budgets across the globe come from the pharmaceutical trade that these businesses are supposed to manage
You’ll be able to sleep simple tonight. The World Well being Group introduced that it’s working with Massive Tech to fight misinformation on-line. It didn’t outline what “misinformation” it’s focusing on, and even what “misinformation” is, however if you happen to see something that appears suspicious, WHO desires you to report it instantly so social media platforms can flag it or take it down.1
Sound disturbing? Extra like a nightmare, nevertheless it’s one that’s, sadly, not a dream. As John Campbell, a retired nurse and instructor primarily based in England, stated within the video above, “It’s virtually as in the event that they wish to have an affect over all elements of social media.”2 Sure, certainly, and so they’re fairly open about it too. WHO states that it’s “altering social media coverage and tips,” and:3
“WHO works with social media coverage departments to make sure firm coverage and tips for content material suppliers are match for function. For instance, WHO labored with YouTube to reinforce their COVID-19 Misinformation Coverage and supply tips for content material suppliers to make sure no medical misinformation associated to the virus proliferates on their platform.”
Practically 1 Million YouTube Movies Taken Down
On account of WHO’s “coverage updates,” 850,000 YouTube movies associated to “dangerous or deceptive COVID-19 misinformation” have been faraway from the platform from February 2020 to January 2021.4 As justification for its rampant censorship, WHO explains:5
“WHO and companions acknowledge that misinformation on-line has the potential to journey additional, sooner and generally deeper than the reality — on some social media platforms, falsehoods are 70% extra more likely to get shared than correct information. To counter this, WHO has taken quite a few actions with tech corporations to stay one step forward.”
Lest you see all sides of a difficulty and kind an informed opinion of your personal, WHO intends to fastidiously management the web so that you solely see what it deems because the “reality.” And it’s working carefully, “on a weekly foundation,” in truth, with grasp manipulators in their very own proper, together with YouTube, Google, Fb and “a number of different companions equivalent to NewsGuard …”6
Ah sure, NewsGuard, one other self-appointed web watchdog that sells a browser plugin to fee web sites on 9 standards of credibility and transparency. NewsGuard obtained a lot of its startup funds from Publicis Groupe, a large international communications group with divisions that model imaging, design of digital enterprise platforms, media relations and well being care.
Publicis Groupe’s well being subsidiary, Publicis Well being, names Lilly, Abbot, Roche, Amgen, Genentech, Celgene, Gilead, Biogen, Astra Zeneca, Sanofi, Bayer and different Massive Pharma giants as shoppers. In actual fact, the PR agency that created and ran Purdue Pharma’s misleading advertising campaigns for the opioid Oxycontin is none aside from Publicis.
At first of Might 2021, the Massachusetts legal professional common filed a lawsuit7 in opposition to Publicis Well being, accusing the Publicis subsidiary of serving to Purdue create the misleading advertising supplies used to mislead docs into prescribing OxyContin. We’re taking place a rabbit gap, however you already know you may inform rather a lot about a company by who its mates are.
‘Defend Your self and Others’ — Report ‘Misinformation’
WHO can also be enlisting the assistance of principally anybody who will pay attention and fall for his or her blatant propaganda to report “misinformation” about COVID-19 and COVID-19 photographs that goes in opposition to its insurance policies. In response to WHO:8
“Social media platforms have … granted WHO entry to quick monitor reporting techniques, which permits us to flag misinformation on their platforms, dashing up the reporting and elimination of content material that breaks coverage. WHO additionally works with Member States such because the Authorities of the UK to boost consciousness of misinformation round COVID-19 and vaccines, and encourage people to report false or deceptive content material on-line.”
Conveniently, WHO has taken the guesswork out of how one can report stated misinformation. They’ve devoted a webpage to reporting misinformation on-line, with direct hyperlinks to the next social media platforms, making it simple to snitch on those that go in opposition to the established order:9
| Fb | YouTube |
| TikTok | |
| Viber | |
| VK | Kwai |
WHO’s Transfer to Create a World Superpower
WHO gained’t cease at controlling the web. It’s additionally aiming to “save the world” from infectious illnesses, meals system failures and extra by making a globalist group with synchronized plans — and the potential for final management and energy.
This was revealed in October 2022, when WHO introduced a brand new initiative known as One Well being Joint Plan of Motion. The plan was launched by the Quadripartite which, along with WHO, consists of the:10
- Meals and Agriculture Group of the United Nations (FAO)
- United Nations Atmosphere Programme (UNEP)
- World Organisation for Animal Well being (WOAH, based as OIE)
WHO already has an excessive amount of energy. This new initiative will solely give it extra. It’s necessary to know that Invoice Gates is WHO’s No. 1 funder, contributing extra to WHO’s $4.84 billion biennial price range11 — through a number of avenues together with the Invoice & Melinda Gates Basis in addition to GAVI, which was based by the Gates Basis in partnership with WHO, the World Financial institution and varied vaccine producers — than any member-state authorities. In brief, Invoice Gates is basically the proprietor of WHO.
Regulatory Businesses Captured by Business
In 1992, the Prescription Drug Person Price Act (PDUFA) was created, which permits the U.S. Meals and Drug Administration to gather charges from the drug trade. “With the act, the FDA moved from a totally taxpayer-funded entity to at least one supplemented by trade cash,” a BMJ article written by investigative journalist Maryanne Demasi explains.12
Now, important parts of regulatory businesses’ budgets come from the pharmaceutical trade that these businesses are supposed to manage. In 1993, after PDUFA was handed, the FDA collected about $29 million in internet PDUFA charges. This elevated 30-fold — to $884 million — by 2016.13
It’s additionally revealing, as famous by Campbell, that on the FDA, 9 out of 10 of its former commissioners between 2006 and 2019 went on to work for pharmaceutical corporations.14 However it’s not solely U.S. regulators who’re captured by trade; an identical development occurred in Europe. In 1995, trade charges funded 20% of the European Medicines Company (EMA). This rose to 75% by 2010 and now, in 2022, it’s 89%. In response to Demasi:15
“In 2005 within the UK, the Home of Commons’ well being committee evaluated the affect of the drug trade on well being coverage, together with the Medicines and Healthcare Merchandise Regulatory Company (MHRA).
The committee was involved that trade funding could lead on the company to ‘lose sight of the necessity to shield and promote public well being above all else because it seeks to win charge earnings from the businesses.’ However practically twenty years on, little has modified, and trade funding of drug regulators has grow to be the worldwide norm.”
How do regulators from completely different nations evaluate? “Business cash permeates the globe’s main regulators,” Demasi wrote, demonstrated as follows:16
| Australia’s Therapeutic Items Administration — 96% of price range derived from trade | Europe’s EMA — 89% |
| U.Ok.’s MHRA — 86% | Japan’s Prescription drugs and Medical Gadgets Company — 85% |
| U.S. FDA — 65% | Well being Canada — 50.5% |
“Are these the official our bodies that we wish to adjudicate over what well being data we’re given, over which medication are good for us and which medication are unhealthy for us?” Campbell stated. “Is that this actually who we wish to make these selections, given the quantity of funding they’re receiving from, what some individuals would possibly contemplate to be, vested pursuits?”17
“We’re speaking about massive quantities of cash, which don’t have any affect on decision-making,” he says sarcastically. “And but these official businesses are going to resolve what well being data you and I are going to obtain.”18
Are We Dwelling Out an Orwellian Actuality?
Entry to data because it as soon as was has been essentially modified. WHO and different world leaders at the moment are working collectively to silence data that doesn’t correspond with its widespread agenda. Even data that was as soon as truth, equivalent to definitions in dictionaries and on official authorities web sites, have been altered in actual time.
Examples of definitions which have been modified embrace these for pandemic, herd immunity, vaccines and anti-vaxxer. Investigative journalist Sharyl Attkisson is amongst those that have defined that nearly every part you see and listen to on-line has been coopted, or taken over to serve a higher agenda. Attkisson reiterates:19
“Just about each type of data and sourcing that may be coopted has been. That features the dictionary definitions, that features every part as a result of these are necessary methods to affect thought. Language may be very highly effective. Folks don’t wish to be affiliated with sure names and labels.
It jogs my memory of 1984, the George Orwell story concerning the futuristic society, below which historical past was being rewritten in actual time to jive with the model that the federal government wished or the social gathering wished it to be. Definitions now are being rewritten and adjusted in actual time to suit with the imaginative and prescient that the institution desires individuals to assume.”
Campbell additionally quotes “1984,” which said, “It was anticipated that Newspeak would have lastly outdated Oldspeak (or Normal English, as we must always name it) by concerning the 12 months 2050.”20 “Let’s hope it doesn’t get there earlier than that,” Campbell stated. “I type of like Oldspeak. It’s the one I used to be introduced up with.”
Orwell wrote, “The aim of Newspeak was not solely to offer a medium of expression for the world-view and psychological habits correct to the devotees of Ingsoc [the ruling party], however to make all different modes of thought not possible.”21
“The C vocabulary [a component of Newspeak] was supplementary to the others and consisted solely of scientific and technical phrases. These resembled the scientific phrases in use immediately, and have been constructed from the identical roots, however the regular care was taken to outline them rigidly and strip them of undesirable meanings.”22
After which there are the three slogans, “Conflict is peace, freedom is slavery, ignorance is energy,” that are contradictory but extensively accepted by the individuals. It’s meals for thought, as WHO and different regulatory businesses grow to be more and more blatant of their censorship and suppression of freedom. “Make of that what you’ll,” Campbell says.
